News : Starlink Competition : Details

A new ultra-compact radio system from Stockholm-based startup TERASi promises high-speed, secure, and interference-resistant communications for defence, disaster response, and industrial operations, without the vulnerabilities of satellite services like Starlink.

A Sovereign Alternative to Satellite Networks?

Unveiled on 21 August 2025, the RU1 is being marketed as the world’s smallest and lightest millimetre-wave (mm-wave) radio with military-grade security. It’s designed to provide sovereign, high-speed backhaul in environments where traditional communications infrastructure is unavailable, unreliable, or compromised.

At a glance, the RU1 looks more like a ruggedised action camera than a piece of battlefield hardware. However, under the hood, it delivers gigabit-speed performance, extreme portability, and a mesh networking capability that could reshape how critical operations stay connected.

The Swedish firm behind the device, TERASi, says it’s built from the ground up to eliminate reliance on third-party providers, offering users full control over their own secure communications infrastructure.

What’s So Different About It?

While satellite services like SpaceX’s Starlink have played a vital role in recent conflicts and disaster responses, they can have some key vulnerabilities. For example, Elon Musk’s decision in 2022 to restrict Starlink coverage during a Ukrainian counteroffensive in Kherson drew widespread criticism. Ukrainian military operations reportedly lost access to real-time drone video, artillery guidance, and unit coordination as a result.

Speaking about those limitations, TERASi co-founder and CEO James Campion said: “The need for sovereign, independent connectivity has never been greater. Our mission is to give defence forces, disaster response teams, and critical industries the ability to create secure, high-capacity networks instantly, anywhere in the world, without relying on satellites or fixed infrastructure.”

Uses Focused Beams Above 60 GHz

The RU1 works by using highly focused directional beams operating above 60 GHz, i.e. a part of the mm-wave spectrum that allows for enormous data capacity and fast speeds. TERASi claims the device currently supports up to 10 Gbps with sub-5 millisecond latency. That’s around 50 times faster than Starlink’s average speed and over five times quicker in terms of response time.

These figures are crucial for scenarios such as live drone control, sensor fusion, and autonomous coordination, where split-second decisions and uninterrupted data flows can determine mission success.

Built for the Field, Not the Lab

One of RU1’s standout features is its deployability. For example, the radio can be mounted on a tripod or drone and configured in minutes. Each device links into a mesh network with others, extending range and resilience without the need for towers, satellites, or cables.

Campion has described it as “the GoPro of backhaul radios”, a deliberate analogy emphasising ease of use and rugged flexibility.

Also, RU1 is designed for off-grid use, with low energy requirements that allow it to run on batteries. This makes it ideal for field deployments where there’s no access to mains electricity or where speed is essential.

The underlying hardware is built on TERASi’s Aircore™ technology, a patented wafer-scale packaging system that allows miniaturisation of high-frequency components. According to the company, this makes RU1 up to 40 times smaller and 100 times lighter than equivalent mm-wave systems currently on the market.

Military, Emergency and Industrial Applications

Although the military sector is the most obvious early adopter, TERASi is also targeting civil and commercial sectors. In disaster relief, for example, RU1 could allow emergency teams to restore high-speed communications across damaged infrastructure almost instantly.

In heavy industry, it could enable temporary wireless networks on construction sites, remote mines, or offshore energy platforms, areas where fibre or satellite links are either too slow to deploy or cost-prohibitive.

The device is currently undergoing evaluation by several defence agencies and is being integrated into systems by tactical communications providers and drone manufacturers. TERASi is also working with system integrators to build end-to-end packages suitable for rapid deployment.

A Potential Challenge to Starlink’s Dominance?

While Starlink has made satellite internet far more accessible in remote areas, its scale and centralised control remain points of concern for sovereign users, i.e. organisations (e.g. governments, militaries, or national emergency services) that require full control over their own communications infrastructure, without relying on foreign-owned or third-party services. The reliance on a single commercial entity, especially one led by an individual as influential and, many would say (particularly after his work in Trump administration), as unpredictable as Elon Musk, has prompted growing debate in both defence and regulatory circles.

Starlink operates using low-frequency radio waves that cover footprints of up to 1,000 km, which may be good for reach, but could be easier to intercept or jam. In contrast, RU1’s laser-like beams create coverage areas as small as 3 km, making them far harder to detect or disrupt.

Campion has been clear about the contrast: “RU1 gives users control over their data and the freedom to build sovereign networks on-the-fly, changing the frontline paradigm from waiting on infrastructure to creating it instantly, from depending on external actors to self-sufficiency.”

However, it’s also clear that RU1 doesn’t aim to replace Starlink on every front. Its strength, for example, essentially lies in short-range, high-speed, secure communications, not global connectivity. In that sense, the two technologies are complementary, but for use cases where sovereignty and speed matter most, RU1 appears to offer distinct advantages.

Looking Beyond the Hype

Despite strong technical claims, RU1’s real-world performance still depends on further field testing and large-scale evaluations. TERASi has not yet confirmed full pricing, mass deployment timelines, or long-term interoperability with wider communications systems.

There are also practical considerations. mm-wave signals are highly directional and can be affected by obstructions or adverse weather. This means line-of-sight placement is likely to be essential, particularly in complex or changing environments.

To address these constraints, TERASi has focused on flexible, mesh-based deployment and drone-mounted coverage. This allows networks to adapt rapidly, reroute around obstacles, and maintain coverage in challenging terrain.

The company’s broader ambitions are also becoming clearer. With backing from the European Space Agency (ESA) on related satellite communications projects, TERASi is positioning itself as a strategic supplier of sovereign networking technologies designed to integrate across land and space-based systems.

Others

It should be noted that TERASi’s RU1 isn’t the only system of this kind. For example, in Finland, KNL Networks, a subsidiary of Telenor, is supplying encrypted manpack radios for long-range communication without relying on satellites. Recently selected by Finland and Sweden in a joint €15 million deal, the technology is being tested by NATO countries for defence scenarios where GPS and satellite signals may be lost or jammed.

Also, in Poland, Microamp is developing rapid-deployable mm-wave 5G “tactical bubbles” to deliver secure, mesh-based networks in mission-critical conditions. These are currently being trialled by NATO’s DIANA programme, with a focus on high-speed, short-range deployments similar to RU1’s.

Ukrainian startup Himera has also attracted international attention with its compact G1 Pro tactical radio, which uses frequency-hopping to resist electronic warfare and runs for up to 48 hours on battery power. The US Air Force is among the defence users currently evaluating the units.

Established defence suppliers Elbit Systems and Rohde & Schwarz also have software-defined radio systems (E-LynX and Soveron respectively) that are already in service with NATO forces. These provide secure, multi-hop communications and battlefield tracking, although they typically require larger form factors and more complex integration.

What Does This Mean For Your Business?

TERASi’s RU1 appears to challenge the idea that advanced, secure communications must rely on satellites or major infrastructure providers. By combining portability, speed and sovereignty in one device, TERASi appears to have created a tool that meets the operational demands of modern defence and emergency teams while also appealing to industries that need rapid, reliable connectivity on their own terms.

The main appeal here lies in control. Unlike Starlink, which has shown it can be restricted or overridden by its operator, RU1 offers users the ability to set up and manage their own high-speed networks independently. That distinction is likely to carry some weight in defence and civil protection, where communication failures can have serious consequences. The technical advantage of higher data rates, lower latency and strong anti-jamming capabilities adds further value for those needing secure performance in dynamic or hostile environments.

For UK businesses, particularly those in sectors like utilities, logistics, remote construction or energy, RU1 introduces the possibility of deploying temporary or semi-permanent high-capacity networks without reliance on local telecoms or satellite providers. That could reduce downtime, improve on-site operations, and enhance resilience in both planned and emergency scenarios. As pressure grows to secure digital infrastructure and keep data under tighter control, this kind of field-ready, self-managed solution could offer a practical alternative where traditional networks fall short.

However, there are still some unknowns here. For example, RU1’s effectiveness in complex or obstructed terrain will need to be proven in large-scale use, and long-term success will depend on integration, cost, and reliability under real conditions. But with geopolitical concerns rising and demand increasing for sovereign technology platforms, RU1 arrives at a time when many governments, organisations and businesses are actively looking for exactly this kind of autonomy.

Tech Insight : Ultra-Secure Quantum Communications Get Closer

Toshiba Europe has successfully sent quantum-encrypted messages across a record 254km of standard commercial fibre optic cable, marking a major step towards achieving real-world quantum-secure communications without relying on highly specialised hardware.

A Record-Breaking Achievement Using Everyday Infrastructure

Quantum cryptography has long promised unbreakable security, but practical challenges have kept it largely confined to laboratories. Quantum key distribution (QKD), a method that uses the principles of quantum mechanics to securely share encryption keys between two parties, ensures that any attempt to intercept the key is instantly detectable. Now, researchers at Toshiba Europe have pushed the boundaries by sending QKD messages across an existing fibre optic network spanning Frankfurt, Kirchfeld and Kehl in Germany.

Using Standard Commercial Equipment, Not Specialist Kit

Importantly, they achieved this milestone without the specialised cryogenic cooling or custom-engineered cables typically required. This makes it the first time coherent quantum communication has been performed at this scale using infrastructure similar to what supports today’s internet traffic.

“This work opens the door to practical quantum networks without needing exotic hardware,” said Mirko Pittaluga, one of the lead authors of the study (published this week in Nature).

The experiment managed a secure transmission rate of around 110 bits per second. While modest compared to classical speeds, it represents an essential proof-of-concept for scaling up quantum communications without prohibitive costs.

What Makes This Different From Previous Efforts?

Quantum key distribution has been demonstrated before. For example, China famously linked Beijing and Shanghai via quantum connections, and even launched a quantum satellite, Micius. However, those efforts typically relied on expensive dedicated infrastructure or free-space optical links requiring near-perfect environmental conditions.

However, Toshiba’s work stands out because it used standard telecom-grade fibre optic cables and commercially viable equipment. There was no need for the ultra-low temperatures usually associated with photon detectors in quantum systems.

How?

The team was able to achieve this by using a technology called twin-field QKD, which cleverly sidesteps many of the transmission losses that usually plague long-distance quantum communication.

Robert Woodward, who leads the fibre QKD research team at Toshiba Europe, described the approach as “using commercially viable components to achieve much higher performance,” paving the way for national and even international scale deployment.

Why Quantum Encryption Matters More Than Ever

Traditional encryption relies on mathematical problems that would take today’s fastest computers billions of years to crack. However, quantum computers (which are still in early stages of development) could one day solve these problems in mere minutes.

This looming threat, often called ‘Q-Day’, has prompted governments and industries worldwide to invest heavily in quantum-secure communications.

QKD Is ‘Untappable’

It seems, therefore, as shown by Toshiba’s experiment, that quantum key distribution offers a potential solution. It uses the principles of quantum mechanics to create a shared encryption key between two parties, with the critical advantage that any attempt to intercept the key would immediately be detectable. In short, it’s untappable.

For example, if an eavesdropper tries to measure the photons used in the transmission, the quantum state of the system changes, alerting both sender and receiver to a breach attempt.

Given the stakes (e.g. applications ranging from securing bank transactions and medical records to protecting national secrets), the ability to run QKD over existing telecoms infrastructure could be a game-changer.

A New Frontier in Data Security for Businesses?

For businesses, Toshiba’s breakthrough may offer the tantalising prospect of ultra-secure communication without the need for massive investment in specialist systems.

In sectors where confidentiality is paramount (e.g. finance, healthcare, legal services, and defence), quantum-safe communication looks as though it could become a standard expectation rather than a futuristic luxury. If commercial telecom providers can integrate QKD into their existing offerings, businesses could access quantum-grade security over regular broadband or leased line connections.

This could lead to:

– New premium-grade secure communication services.

– Enhanced protection for sensitive client data.

– Increased resilience against future quantum threats.

– Competitive advantage for early adopters of quantum-safe systems.

As Mirko Pittaluga puts it: “It lowers the entry barrier for industry adoption.”

Speed, Cost, and Infrastructure Risks

Despite the excitement, significant hurdles remain before QKD becomes mainstream. For example:

– The data rates achievable today are extremely low. At 110 bits per second, Toshiba’s demonstration is far from supporting the bandwidth needs of typical modern businesses.

– While the system does use existing fibres, it still requires highly sensitive (though now commercially available) equipment to detect single photons and manage synchronisation over long distances.

– While quantum signals themselves are secure, the underlying fibre network remains vulnerable to physical attacks. As James Millen (an experimental quantum scientist at King’s College London) warned, “using existing optical fibre infrastructure is more cost-effective, but it introduces potential vulnerabilities through attacks on the physical network itself.”

In short, while QKD can detect eavesdropping, it cannot prevent fibre cables being physically damaged, tapped at the hardware level, or sabotaged.

Not All Experts Are Fully Convinced

Despite the obvious promise here, some researchers have expressed cautious optimism rather than unqualified celebration. For example, while Professor Sandrine Heutz of Imperial College London has praised the breakthrough as a “significant advance”, she has also highlighted the need for “practical engineering approaches combining sustainability with performance” before quantum networks can scale.

Others point out that alternative post-quantum cryptography methods (i.e. those based on mathematical techniques designed to resist quantum attacks) may offer a more immediate and scalable solution for many businesses.

That said, QKD appears to offer a completely different security model, i.e. true information-theoretic security, rather than security based on assumptions of computational difficulty.

A Step Closer to a Quantum-Connected Future

Toshiba’s success may be a clear signal that quantum encryption is becoming more than just a theoretical concept. It could also be seen as showing that businesses could soon have access to ultra-secure communications without relying on highly specialised or impractical technology. The real challenge now will be extending QKD into broader networks, scaling transmission speeds, and driving down costs so it becomes viable for everyday use.

What Does This Mean For Your Business?

Toshiba’s breakthrough brings the vision of ultra-secure quantum communications significantly closer to reality. For UK businesses, particularly those handling sensitive client information or operating in highly regulated sectors, the prospect of deploying quantum-safe communication networks using existing fibre infrastructure is beginning to look far more attainable. It suggests a future where ultra-secure encryption could be a built-in feature of mainstream services, rather than a costly, bespoke solution accessible only to a few.

However, businesses will need to stay alert. Although Toshiba’s achievement shows what is possible, there are still some serious barriers to its practical deployment on a wide scale. For example, current data transmission rates are far too low for everyday commercial needs, and the cost of equipping networks with suitable quantum-ready hardware remains high. Companies that invest early may gain a competitive edge in terms of trust and security, but must also weigh the risks and realities of early adoption.

For telecoms providers, technology firms, and national infrastructure planners, the success of Toshiba’s test sends a strong signal that investment in quantum communication systems is no longer just experimental. As QKD capabilities improve and costs fall, we may start to see broader moves towards building quantum-safe national networks, which is something governments across Europe and beyond are now likely to be very interested in.

At the same time, this new chapter in cyber security brings fresh challenges for infrastructure security and network resilience. While quantum signals themselves are robust against hacking, the physical cables they travel through remain vulnerable to attack. Any future strategy must therefore combine quantum encryption with strong physical and network security measures.

Toshiba’s test seems to be a turning point in that it shows that quantum cryptography is moving out of the lab and into the real world.