Video Update : New Computer Use Feature In Copilot’s Researcher

Microsoft’s helpful new Computer Use feature in Copilot Researcher allows the AI to interact directly with websites and software on a user’s behalf, helping automate complex online tasks, speed up research workflows, and reduce the time spent manually navigating between apps and services.

[Note – To Watch This Video without glitches/interruptions, It may be best to download it first]

Tech News : OpenAI Invests in Sam Altman’s Brain Computer Interface Startup Merge Labs

OpenAI has invested in Merge Labs, a new brain computer interface research company cofounded by its chief executive Sam Altman, marking an escalation in efforts to link human cognition directly with artificial intelligence.

BCIs, The Next Frontier?

The investment, confirmed by OpenAI, sees the AI company participate as the largest single backer in Merge Labs’ seed funding round, which raised around $250 million at a reported valuation of approximately $850 million. While OpenAI did not disclose the size of its individual cheque, the company said the move reflects its belief that brain computer interfaces, often shortened to BCIs, represent an important next frontier in how people interact with advanced AI systems.

Merge Labs

Merge Labs, a US-based research organisation, became publicly known in January 2026 after operating privately during its early research phase, positioning itself as a long-term lab focused on what it describes as “bridging biological and artificial intelligence to maximise human ability, agency, and experience”. The company is not targeting near-term consumer products, instead framing its work as a decades-long effort to develop new forms of non-invasive neural interfaces intended to expand how information flows between the human brain and machines.

A Circular Investment With Strategic Implications

The deal has attracted quite a bit of attention because of its circular structure. For example, Sam Altman is both the chief executive of OpenAI and a cofounder of Merge Labs, participating in the new venture in a personal capacity. However, OpenAI has been quick to confirm that Altman does not receive investment allocations from the OpenAI Startup Fund, which typically manages such investments, but the overlap has raised questions about governance, incentives, and long-term alignment.

OpenAI outlined its strategic rationale in a blog post announcing the investment, saying, “Progress in interfaces enables progress in computing”, and that “Each time people gain a more direct way to express intent, technology becomes more powerful and more useful.”

A New Way To Interact With AI

The company said brain computer interfaces “open new ways to communicate, learn, and interact with technology” and could create “a natural, human-centred way for anyone to seamlessly interact with AI”. That framing positions BCIs not primarily as medical devices, but as potential successors to keyboards, touchscreens, and voice interfaces.

Funding

Merge Labs’ funding round also included backing from Bain Capital, Interface Fund, Fifty Years, and Valve founder Gabe Newell. Seth Bannon, a founding partner at Fifty Years, said the company represents a continuation of humanity’s long effort to build tools that extend human capabilities, while Merge Labs itself has stressed that its work remains at an early research stage.

What Merge Labs Is Actually Building

Unlike many existing BCI efforts, Merge Labs is actually aiming to avoid surgically implanted devices. For example, the company says it is developing “entirely new technologies that connect with neurons using molecules instead of electrodes” and that transmit and receive information using deep-reaching modalities such as ultrasound.

In its own published materials, Merge Labs explains the motivation behind this approach. “Our individual experience of the world arises from billions of active neurons,” the company wrote. “If we can interface with these neurons at scale, we could restore lost abilities, support healthier brain states, deepen our connection with each other, and expand what we can imagine and create alongside advanced AI.”

Current BCIs typically rely on electrodes placed on the scalp or implanted directly into brain tissue. These approaches involve trade-offs between signal quality, invasiveness, safety, and long-term reliability. Merge Labs argues that scaling BCIs to be useful for broad human-AI interaction will require increases in bandwidth and brain coverage “by several orders of magnitude” while becoming significantly less invasive.

Why AI Is Central To The Approach

The company also said recent advances across biotechnology, neuroscience, hardware engineering, and machine learning have made this approach more plausible. Its stated vision is for future BCIs to be “equal parts biology, device, and AI”, with artificial intelligence playing a central role in interpreting neural signals that are inherently noisy, variable, and highly individual.

OpenAI has said it will collaborate with Merge Labs on scientific foundation models and other frontier AI tools to accelerate research, particularly in interpreting intent and adapting interfaces to individual users.

How This Compares With Neuralink

Merge Labs’ ambitions seem to place it in direct comparison with Neuralink, the brain computer interface company founded by Elon Musk. Neuralink has already implanted devices into human patients, primarily targeting people with severe paralysis who cannot speak or move.

However, Neuralink’s approach is invasive, i.e., it requires a surgical robot to remove a small portion of the skull and insert ultra-fine electrode threads into the brain. These electrodes read neural signals that are then translated into digital commands, allowing users to control computers or other devices using thought alone.

In June 2025, Neuralink raised a $650 million Series E funding round at a valuation of around $9 billion, highlighting strong investor confidence in implant-based BCIs for medical use. Musk has described Neuralink as a path towards closer human-AI integration, while also framing it as a way to reduce long-term risks from advanced artificial intelligence.

Why The Merge Labs Approach Is Different

It’s worth noting here that Merge Labs differs in both method and emphasis. For example, it is pursuing non-invasive technologies and has placed greater focus on safety, accessibility, and long-term societal impact. Its founders have said initial applications would likely focus on patients with injury or disease, before extending more broadly.

The contrast reflects a wider divide within the BCI field. For example, invasive implants currently offer clearer signals and faster progress, but carry surgical risks and ethical concerns. Non-invasive approaches reduce those risks but face substantial technical challenges in achieving sufficient bandwidth and precision.

Potential Benefits And Serious Challenges

If Merge Labs’ approach proves viable, the implications could extend beyond healthcare. High-bandwidth brain interfaces could alter how people learn, communicate, and interact with AI systems, potentially enabling more intuitive control of complex software or new forms of collaboration.

OpenAI has framed BCIs as one possible way to maintain meaningful human involvement as AI systems become more capable. Altman has previously written that closer integration between humans and machines could reduce the imbalance between human cognition and artificial intelligence, although he has also acknowledged the uncertainty involved.

At the same time, the risks are significant. For example, neural data is among the most sensitive forms of personal information, raising serious concerns around privacy, security, and consent. Misuse or coercive deployment of BCIs could present challenges that exceed those posed by existing digital technologies.

There are also unresolved scientific and regulatory questions. Accurately interpreting neural signals at scale remains difficult, and the long-term effects of repeated or continuous brain interaction are not fully understood. Regulatory frameworks for BCIs, particularly outside clinical contexts, remain limited.

Also, some critics have argued that heavy investment in cognitive enhancement technologies risks diverting attention from more immediate AI governance challenges, including labour disruption, misinformation, and the concentration of technological power.

For now, Merge Labs remains a research-focused organisation rather than a product company. Its founders have said success should be measured not by early demonstrations, but by whether it can eventually create products that are safe, privacy-preserving, and genuinely useful to people.

What Does This Mean For Your Business?

OpenAI’s decision to back Merge Labs highlights how seriously some of the most influential figures in AI are now thinking about the limits of current human computer interfaces. While the technology Merge Labs is pursuing remains highly experimental and many years away from practical deployment, the investment signals a belief that future gains in AI capability may depend as much on how humans interact with systems as on the systems themselves.

For UK businesses, this matters less as an immediate technology shift and more as an early indicator of where long-term AI development is heading. If brain computer interfaces eventually become safer, scalable, and non-invasive, they could reshape how knowledge work, training, accessibility, and human decision making interact with advanced software. Sectors such as healthcare, advanced manufacturing, engineering, defence, and education would likely be among the first to feel downstream effects, while regulators and employers would face new questions around data protection, consent, and cognitive security.

At the same time, the story highlights unresolved tensions that extend beyond any single company. For example, investors are betting on radically new forms of human machine integration, while scientists and policymakers are still grappling with the ethical, medical, and societal risks involved. Whether Merge Labs ultimately succeeds or not, OpenAI’s involvement brings brain computer interfaces a little closer to the centre of the AI conversation, forcing businesses, governments, and the public to start engaging with implications that until recently sat firmly at the edge of speculative technology.

Tech Insight : Tasty Offering : Raspberry Pi

With Raspberry Pi Ltd considering an Initial Public Offering, we look at what this kind of computer is, its value in promoting computer literacy, and what similar alternatives there are.

Raspberry Pi 

Raspberry Pi, the most well-known Pi, is a series of small, affordable, single-board computers (SBCs) developed by the Raspberry Pi Foundation in the United Kingdom. It is a leader in low-cost, high-performance computing that has now been around for some time. For example, the first Raspberry Pi was introduced on 29 February 2012 and several models featuring improvements in performance, memory, and connectivity options have been introduced since then. The different models cater to a variety of user needs, from the basic Model A and A+ to the more advanced Model B and B+ series, and the high-performance Raspberry Pi 4.

Who Is It For? 

The primary goal of the Raspberry Pi project is to promote the teaching of basic computer science in schools and developing countries. Also, as Eben Upton, CEO of Raspberry Pi points out, it was designed to be “affordable enough for young people to own and explore with confidence”. 

Raspberry Pi is actually a subsidiary of the Raspberry Pi Foundation, which is a UK charity (founded in 2008), with the goal of promoting interest in computer science among young people.

Large Community 

Raspberry Pi products (which are available in over 70 countries) actually enjoy a great deal of community support as they are backed by a large, active community of users and developers who share projects, tutorials, and software, facilitating learning and problem-solving.

Markets

Raspberry Pi says its products are actually sold in three principal markets: the Industrial and Embedded market, which in 2023 accounted for 72 per cent of unit sales, the Enthusiast and Education market, which in 2023 accounted for 28 per cent of unit sales, and the semiconductor market, which Raspberry Pi entered in early 2021 with the launch of its first semiconductor product ( the RP2040 microcontroller).

Raspberry Pi Vs Traditional Computers – What Are The Differences?

The main differences between a Raspberry Pi and other traditional desktop and laptop computers are:

– Size and form. They are significantly smaller (often credit card-sized), making them ideal for space-limited projects.

– It’s much more affordable – ranging from £4 to £35, making it accessible to students and hobbyists.

– The difference in hardware. For example, it comes as a bare circuit board, requiring users to connect their own peripherals like keyboard, mouse, and monitor.

– The operating system. It typically runs a Linux-based OS, with Raspberry Pi OS being the most common, unlike the Windows or macOS on traditional computers.

– The GPIO pins, i.e. it features General-Purpose Input/Output pins for connecting and controlling external hardware like sensors and motors, ideal for DIY projects and hardware programming.

– Much lower power consumption, making it suitable for always-on or power-sensitive projects.

– Community and resources. As mentioned above, it’s supported by a large, active community.

Why Is It In The News? 

Raspberry Pi Ltd is in the news at the moment because it is considering an Initial Public Offering – it has announced its expected intention to float on the London Stock Exchange. Raspberry Pi has a strong track record of revenue growth and profitability and for the year ended 31 December 2023, revenues were $265.8 million. Although a valuation for the company hasn’t been officially announced, it’s been rumoured that £300 million+ doesn’t seem too unlikely.

Also, Raspberry Pi has made the news recently because:

– It has unveiled several new products, such as an AI camera kit featuring a 12MP Sony IMX500 sensor, a new 15.6-inch monitor with HDMI connectivity, and the long-awaited M.2 HAT for fast NVMe storage on the Raspberry Pi 5.

– The Raspberry Pi Foundation has significantly increased production of Raspberry Pi 5 units, with the goal of manufacturing up to 90,000 boards per week.

– A new Compute Module 5 (CM5) looks likely to launch soon.

Alternatives

Raspberry Pi is, however, not the only single-board computer or microcontroller out there, and these alternatives are typically aimed at (and used by) a variety of audiences, each with different applications in mind. Here are a few of the most popular SBC alternatives to Raspberry Pi:

– Arduino. While not a direct competitor, Arduino boards are widely used in electronics projects and prototyping. Unlike the Raspberry Pi, Arduino is a microcontroller rather than a full computer. Models include the Arduino Uno, Arduino Mega, and Arduino Nano.

– BeagleBone. BeagleBone boards are powerful single-board computers similar to the Raspberry Pi but often offer more I/O options and are used for more advanced projects. Models include the BeagleBone Black, and BeagleBone Green.

– Odroid. These boards are known for their high performance and are suitable for applications requiring more computing power. Popular models include the Odroid XU4, Odroid C2, and the Odroid N2+.

– Banana Pi. These boards are similar to Raspberry Pi in form factor and functionality but often come with additional features like more RAM or better network connectivity. Models include the Banana Pi M4, and Banana Pi M2 Zero.

– Rock Pi boards offer high performance and are compatible with a range of operating systems, including Linux and Android. Popular models include the Rock Pi 4, and Rock Pi X.

– NanoPi. These boards are compact and affordable, catering to various applications from simple projects to more complex IoT solutions. Models include the NanoPi M4, and NanoPi Neo4.

– Orange Pi. These boards are regarded as being versatile and budget-friendly and can be used for a range of applications similar to the Raspberry Pi. Popular models include the Orange Pi Zero, and Orange Pi PC.

What Does This Mean For Your Business? 

The advancements in single-board computers (SBCs) like Raspberry Pi, along with similar devices (e.g. Orange Pi, Arduino, BeagleBone, and Odroid) are transforming the landscape for UK businesses across various sectors. These versatile and affordable tools offer significant value to different user groups, driving innovation and efficiency in multiple domains.

For educational institutions, for example, these devices provide an excellent platform for teaching computer science and STEM subjects. By incorporating SBCs into the curriculum, schools and universities can offer hands-on learning experiences that enhance students’ technical skills and creativity. This not only prepares students for future careers in technology but also fosters a culture of innovation from a young age.

In the realm of development and engineering, businesses can leverage the flexibility and cost-effectiveness of SBCs for rapid prototyping and product development. Whether it’s a startup developing new IoT solutions or an established company refining its automation processes, these devices enable quick iterations and testing at a fraction of the cost of traditional development platforms. The extensive community support and resources available for these devices further facilitate innovation and problem-solving.

Industrial applications also benefit significantly from the deployment of SBCs. For example, the robustness and adaptability of these devices make them ideal for creating custom automation systems, enhancing operational efficiency, and reducing costs. Businesses can implement tailored solutions for monitoring, control, and data analysis, improving productivity and decision-making processes.

The potential flotation of Raspberry Pi and the growth of its competitors like Arduino and BeagleBone could bring significant changes to the market. Increased capital from public offerings would enable these companies to accelerate their innovation cycles, enhance their product offerings, and expand their market reach. This competitive environment could lead to more advanced, cost-effective solutions, benefiting consumers and businesses alike.

For businesses considering the adoption of SBCs, the stability and growth prospects of these companies are likely to mean continued support and development for their platforms. This assurance can encourage more extensive integration of these devices into business operations, knowing that they are backed by financially robust and innovative companies. Moreover, the diverse ecosystem of SBCs ensures that businesses can choose the most suitable device for their specific needs, whether it’s for educational purposes, development, or industrial applications.