Sustainability-In-Tech : Old Smartphones Find A Second Life As Tiny Data Centres

Researchers have developed a low cost way to turn discarded smartphones into tiny data centres that can support real world environmental and civic projects.

Why Old Smartphones Still Matter

More than 1.2 billion smartphones are produced every year, yet most are replaced within two or three years even when they remain fully functional. The environmental cost of this rapid cycle is significant. Smartphone manufacturing is energy intensive, relies on mined materials such as cobalt and lithium, and contributes to the 62 billion kilograms of global e-waste recorded in 2022. Only a small proportion is formally recycled, so millions of phones end up forgotten in drawers or sent to landfill.

Consequently, many sustainability groups have long been arguing that extending device lifespans is one of the most effective ways to cut electronic waste, since the majority of a smartphone’s carbon footprint is created during manufacturing. Until recently, extending that lifespan usually meant refurbishment or resale. The latest research from the University of Tartu (in Estonia) shows that a third option is now possible, one that reuses phones in a completely different role.

The Idea Behind Tiny Data Centres

The new approach comes from a team of European researchers whose study in IEEE Pervasive Computing explains how old smartphones can be reprogrammed and linked together as miniature data centres. The aim is not to compete with traditional cloud computing, but to show that many small and local tasks do not require new hardware at all.

The team, led by researchers including Huber Flores, Ulrich Norbisrath and Zhigang Yin, began by taking phones that were already considered e-waste. The devices were stripped of batteries and connected to external power supplies to avoid chemical leakage risks that can arise when batteries degrade. This small step is important for long term deployments, since lithium-ion batteries can swell or leak when left unused for years.

Four phones were then connected together, placed inside a 3D printed holder, and configured so that the system acted as a single working prototype. According to the researchers, this entire process cost around €8 per device, making it far cheaper than installing new embedded computing hardware for similar tasks. As Flores explains, “Innovation often begins not with something new, but with a new way of thinking about the old, re imagining its role in shaping the future.”

Putting Repurposed Phones To Work

The first major test took place underwater. The tiny data centre was used to support marine life monitoring by processing video and sensor data directly below the surface. This type of survey work usually depends on scuba divers recording footage and bringing it back for analysis. The prototype allowed that analysis to happen automatically on site, reducing labour, shortening processing time, and avoiding the need to send large data files across networks.

Edge Computing

This approach is known as edge computing, where data is processed close to the source rather than in distant data centres. Repurposed smartphones are well suited to this because they are built to handle local storage, low power processing and real time tasks. It means they can support use cases where traditional servers would be excessive or impractical.

Also On Land

It should be noted that there are some clear examples on land too. For example, the Tartu team highlights how a unit placed at a bus stop could gather anonymised information about passenger numbers, waiting times and traffic levels. Transport agencies could use that real time data to improve timetables or plan new routes. It is the same principle behind many smart city projects, but achieved with hardware that already exists.

The researchers also point towards environmental monitoring, urban air quality measurements, small scale agricultural sensing, and certain machine learning applications where data volumes remain modest. These tasks do not demand the full power of modern workstations, yet they still require reliable processing in locations where installing new equipment is expensive or unnecessary.

A Sustainability Case With Wider Implications

The argument for tiny data centres is not only technical, but is also rooted in sustainability thinking.

For example, smartphone production is responsible for significant emissions and resource extraction. Therefore, extending the life of older devices makes use of computing power that would otherwise sit idle or be discarded. In a world where global demand for computing continues to rise, repurposing offers a practical way to satisfy some of that demand without adding new manufacturing emissions.

Ulrich Norbisrath, one of the researchers involved, summarises this perspective clearly: “Sustainability is not just about preserving the future, it is about reimagining the present, where yesterday’s devices become tomorrow’s opportunities.”

The project reflects a broader trend within the digital sustainability community, where attention is turning towards resource efficiency and circularity. From longer software support periods to designs that support repair and reuse, the goal is to reduce reliance on a constant flow of new devices. Repurposing smartphones as micro data centres adds another practical option to that toolkit.

Practical Challenges Still To Address

Although this sounds like real progress, the researchers are realistic about the obstacles. For example, one major hurdle is the wide variety of smartphone models. Chipsets, memory sizes and firmware differ significantly across brands and generations, making it difficult to build a universal method for bypassing hardware restrictions. The study calls for the creation of tools that are hardware agnostic so that more people can repurpose devices without advanced technical knowledge.

Energy supply is another issue. Although the devices draw little power individually, long term deployments in remote locations require stable energy sources and protection from moisture, heat and physical damage. This makes the design of the 3D printed casing and supporting hardware an important part of the overall system.

Security also needs careful thought. For example, smartphones were never designed to operate as unattended networked devices, so any repurposed system must have secure software, strong update controls and physical safeguards. Without this, there is a risk that poorly maintained clusters could introduce vulnerabilities.

The team stresses that their prototype is really a proof of concept, i.e., it shows what is feasible today and identifies where future development is most needed, including standardised tools, easier configuration processes and larger scale trials.

What Does This Mean For Your Organisation?

UK organisations are under growing pressure to reduce waste, cut emissions and make better use of the resources they already hold. Repurposed smartphones could present a practical way to help support those goals, especially for businesses that cycle through large numbers of devices each year. Treating retired phones as reusable computing assets rather than waste creates immediate value and avoids the environmental cost of manufacturing yet another round of hardware. It also offers a route to experiment with local data processing without committing to major capital spending.

For many firms, the most relevant opportunity lies in small scale, on site tasks where data needs to be collected, processed and acted on quickly. Old smartphones can support building management, environmental monitoring, simple analytics and other operational jobs that do not require full server deployments. This keeps data close to the source, avoids unnecessary cloud usage and aligns with wider efforts to improve energy efficiency. The approach also speaks directly to the sustainability strategies now expected by regulators, investors and customers who want evidence that companies are reducing electronic waste in credible ways.

There is a clear benefit for local authorities, utilities and public services too. Tightly constrained budgets mean that projects often stall for lack of affordable hardware. Repurposed phones give these stakeholders a way to test new ideas at low cost, from monitoring passenger numbers to gathering air quality data. This helps build evidence, speed up innovation and guide investment decisions without locking into expensive platforms from day one.

Technology suppliers and service partners may also find value in developing tools that make repurposing easier. Businesses increasingly want flexible, lower carbon digital solutions and the research points towards a future market for hardware agnostic software that can unify mixed phone models into consistent micro data centres. For the UK’s growing sustainability and digital sectors, this represents a fresh area of opportunity.

The wider message for all stakeholders is that existing technology still has untapped potential. Repurposing does not replace secure recycling or responsible disposal, but it does extend the useful life of devices that would otherwise remain unused. For UK businesses looking to reduce waste, cut costs and support their environmental commitments, the University of Tartu’s work shows that old smartphones can play a meaningful role in creating a more resource efficient digital environment.

Sustainability-In-Tech : Students Trial Paid Recycling

Students at New College Lanarkshire are now being financially rewarded for recycling cans and plastic bottles as part of a new trial designed to test how incentives influence sustainable habits.

How the Trial Works and Why It Matters

The month-long trial, which runs across the college’s Motherwell, Coatbridge and Cumbernauld campuses, offers students a 20p reward for every eligible drinks container they deposit into one of the on-site Reverse Vending Machines (RVMs). The incentive is redeemable at campus canteens and aims to encourage better recycling habits among young people.

The scheme is being run in partnership with Coca‑Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) and environmental charity Keep Scotland Beautiful, which has previously collaborated on a similar project at the University of Strathclyde. There, researchers found that around half of students said a financial incentive would make them more likely to recycle.

The New College Lanarkshire initiative is designed to build on those findings and go a step further. In addition to tracking RVM usage, it also involves selected three-person student households taking part in a two-week live trial of the wider Deposit Return Scheme (DRS). This includes documenting their daily experience with returning containers, offering a more realistic picture of what works and what doesn’t.

Ronnie Gilmour, Deputy Principal at New College Lanarkshire, said: “We know that living in a clean and sustainable environment is very important to our students. I’m sure the data gathered through the scheme will make an important contribution to understanding behaviour around recycling.”

Jo Padwick, Senior Sustainability Manager at Coca-Cola Europacific Partners Great Britain (CCEP GB), added: “Giving students the chance to live with a Deposit Return Scheme – something that will soon be a part of everyday life – allows us to see first-hand how people interact with RVMs in reality.”

Learning from Behavioural Insights

The financial incentive is not just a token gesture but is part of a growing body of work examining what genuinely motivates people to recycle. For example, while many support environmental goals in principle, real-world participation often depends on convenience and personal benefit.

As Barry Fisher, Chief Executive at Keep Scotland Beautiful, explained: “We’ve learned from previous campaigns what encourages positive recycling behaviours by students and hope that this 20p incentive will motivate more people to recycle plastic bottles and cans.”

The trial also focuses on the design of messaging, campaign materials and ease of use. The students are being asked to feed back on these elements to help fine-tune future rollout strategies, particularly as Scotland prepares for the introduction of a national Deposit Return Scheme.

Other Reverse Vending Trials Gaining Ground

It should be noted here that the Lanarkshire scheme is not the only one of it’s kind. Across the UK, similar projects are being tested as local authorities, colleges and retailers look to increase recycling rates and reduce litter.

For example, earlier this year, Middlesbrough Council became the first local authority in England to pilot a council-backed RVM in a community setting. Residents could deposit containers in exchange for a 10p discount at a local eco shop, helping both to clean up streets and support sustainable consumer behaviour.

Also, in West Suffolk, the college campus installed one of the UK’s earliest RVMs, allowing students to return bottles for small incentives while learning about closed-loop recycling. Meanwhile, major UK supermarkets including Tesco, Sainsbury’s and Iceland have tested RVMs in-store to gauge customer reactions ahead of any mandatory DRS rollout.

Scotland had originally planned to launch a national DRS in 2024, though this has now been postponed until at least 2027 due to technical and legislative hurdles. That said, trials like those in Lanarkshire seem to be laying the groundwork by identifying what motivates users, where friction points occur, and how to integrate RVMs into everyday behaviour.

Broader Sustainability Gains from DRS Schemes

Deposit Return Schemes are actually widely used across Europe, with some notable success. For example, in Norway, Germany and Lithuania, return rates for cans and plastic bottles regularly exceed 90 per cent. The key appears to be combining convenience with a financial incentive (however small).

Also, Ireland recently introduced its first nationwide DRS (in February 2024). By August 2024, monthly return volumes had surged from just 2 million to over 111 million containers. That growth not only reduced waste but also generated funds for local charities and encouraged public buy-in.

According to the European Commission, DRS schemes can reduce litter by up to a massive 80 per cent and dramatically increase material recovery rates, helping to conserve resources and reduce the carbon footprint of packaging.

UK Government’s Own Scheme In 2027

The UK Government has now committed to introducing its own scheme, with England, Wales and Northern Ireland targeting a 2027 start. However, key decisions on scope, technology and implementation remain under review. Scotland’s experience with voluntary trials could therefore play a valuable role in shaping UK-wide plans.

Why These Schemes Matter for UK Businesses

Businesses, particularly those in food, drink, and retail, are paying close attention. The shift to DRS will have operational and cost implications for manufacturers, distributors and retailers alike. However, those that embrace the change may also find new opportunities in brand perception, customer loyalty and sustainable supply chain models.

There’s also a longer-term strategic point. As ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) pressures mount, and consumers grow more selective, companies that can point to credible sustainability actions are better placed to meet stakeholder expectations and future regulation.

RVMs and DRS schemes, while not a silver bullet, offer one practical and measurable way to demonstrate environmental leadership, particularly if the data gathered can show improved recycling rates, reduced litter, and more engaged communities.

Global Energy Demand for AI Raises Concern

While initiatives like these reward sustainable behaviour in the UK and Europe, it could be said that some international policy developments appear to be heading in the opposite direction.

For example, in the United States, President Donald Trump has made AI infrastructure a strategic priority for economic and geopolitical dominance. At a recent White House dinner with leading tech CEOs, including OpenAI’s Sam Altman and Google’s Sundar Pichai, Trump pledged to remove all regulatory obstacles to data centre expansion, particularly grid access and power supply.

“We’re making it very easy for you in terms of electric capacity and getting it for you, getting your permits,” Trump said, referencing a new executive order to fast-track approvals for data centres and associated energy infrastructure.

While this may sound business-friendly, the implications for sustainability are potentially very serious. For example, a 2025 Deloitte Insights report warned that the US data centre industry’s energy use could grow more than thirtyfold by 2035, largely driven by demand for generative AI. That level of consumption would put immense pressure on grid capacity and fossil fuel dependency, especially as Trump’s administration continues to back oil, gas and nuclear expansion while rolling back clean energy incentives.

The Washington Post recently reported that Trump’s “Drill, Baby, Drill 2.0” policy package includes a reversal of federal solar incentives and accelerated leasing of federal land for oil and gas extraction, sparking backlash from environmental groups.

The US is not the only country that could be accused of pushing in the opposite direction. For example, in June, South Korea’s government greenlit a major nuclear build-out to power AI-focused data campuses, with six new gigawatt reactors planned. Critics have argued that the move appears to be prioritising tech industry growth over clean energy transition.

Balancing Innovation and Environmental Responsibility

The contrast here appears to be quite striking. For example, whereas grassroots UK initiatives are exploring how small incentives and smart tech can encourage sustainable habits, some of the world’s largest economies are racing to power the next AI boom, regardless of the carbon consequences.

The lesson for UK businesses may be that while innovation is essential, sustainability can’t be treated as a separate issue and that every action either supports or undermines the wider climate goal.

What Does This Mean For Your Organisation?

What seems to stand out here is the growing gap between local action and global energy trends. In the UK and much of Europe, trials like those at New College Lanarkshire are building practical knowledge of how to drive behaviour change, reduce waste, and strengthen public support for more circular economic models. These are small-scale but targeted interventions that gather real data and encourage responsible habits from the ground up. For UK businesses, particularly those in sectors linked to packaging, consumer goods, or logistics, these schemes offer more than just a compliance challenge. They present a chance to align with shifting expectations, enhance transparency, and actively contribute to measurable sustainability outcomes.

At the same time, however, the direction being taken by governments such as the United States and South Korea raises some clear concerns. While investment in AI and advanced technology is often framed as a national priority, the energy demands required to support that growth (especially in the form of new datacentres) are enormous. The rollback of environmental safeguards in pursuit of short-term infrastructure expansion risks locking in decades of emissions at precisely the moment when global targets require the opposite. UK businesses operating internationally, or relying on cloud-based and AI services, will, therefore, need to consider how these developments affect their own carbon reporting, risk exposure, and supply chain decisions.

For UK companies aiming to future-proof their operations, the challenge is not just to adopt greener practices internally, but to understand and influence the broader systems they are part of. In that context, student-led trials of recycling machines may offer insights that go well beyond the campus gates.

Sustainability-In-Tech : Turning Waste & Microbes Into Food

A Hamburg–Lisbon startup is turning agricultural waste into protein powder using microbes, producing vegan dog treats today and working towards reshaping tomorrow’s food system.

MicroHarvest

MicroHarvest was founded in 2021 by Katelijne Bekers, Luísa Cruz, and Paulo Teixeira, and operates between Hamburg and Lisbon. The company specialises in microbial fermentation, a process that uses bacteria to convert by-products from the agricultural industry into protein-rich biomass.

At its Lisbon pilot plant, based in a former military food factory now known as the Unicorn Factory, large fermenters are filled with microbes and fed residual sugars from crops. Within 24 hours, those microbes multiply rapidly, creating a thick broth that is harvested, inactivated, and dried into a beige powder resembling flour. The result is a product with over 60 per cent protein content, alongside fibre, essential amino acids, iron, and vitamin B2.

MicroHarvest describes its approach as sustainable, scalable, and highly efficient. A life-cycle analysis suggests its process generates only 1.4 kg of CO₂ per kilogram of protein, two to three times less than most plant-based proteins and dramatically less than beef or dairy.

What Products Are Already on the Market?

While human consumption awaits regulatory approval, MicroHarvest has already moved into the pet-food sector. For example, in 2024, the company partnered with German brand VEGDOG to launch Pure Bites, a dog treat made with microbial protein, potato, and apple pomace. The snack was introduced at Interzoo Europe, one of the continent’s largest pet-food trade events, and is marketed as hypoallergenic, nutritious, and suitable for dogs with intolerances.

Dogs More Receptive To Microbial Protein Treats

Interestingly, palatability trials carried out by MicroHarvest found that dogs were more receptive to microbial protein treats than to poultry-based alternatives, with 85 per cent acceptance compared to 75 per cent. Also, a consumer survey across the UK and Germany showed similar openness, with around 78 per cent of dog owners saying they would consider buying pet food containing microbial protein.

This early focus on pet nutrition appears to make sense for the company as the animal feed and pet food sectors are less tightly regulated than human products, thereby enabling a faster route to market. They also represent a growing sector where sustainable, alternative protein sources are in high demand.

How the Technology Works

MicroHarvest’s process is based on microbial fermentation, a technique familiar from traditional foods such as yoghurt, kefir, and sauerkraut. The company cultivates specific bacterial strains in bioreactors, using agricultural by-products like molasses or other sugar streams as feedstock.

Once the microbes have multiplied, the biomass is separated, the cells are inactivated through heat treatment, and the material is dried into a stable protein powder. The entire cycle takes less than a day, compared with months for growing soy or years for raising livestock.

According to the company, the method reduces land use by up to 99 per cent and cuts carbon emissions by more than 70 per cent compared to beef. Also, because the process is carried out indoors, it can be established close to existing food or feed industries, bypassing the need for extensive farmland.

Why It Matters for Sustainability

The global demand for protein is expected to increase by around 50 per cent by 2050. Meeting that need through conventional farming would intensify deforestation, water use, and greenhouse gas emissions. Alternative proteins are seen as essential to bridging the gap without worsening environmental pressures.

A 2022 study in Nature suggested that replacing just 20 per cent of global beef consumption with microbial proteins could halve annual deforestation rates by mid-century. For companies like MicroHarvest, these figures highlight the potential of microbial protein to play a serious role in climate and food-security strategies.

MicroHarvest’s stated aim is to deliver protein that is not only sustainable but also versatile. Beyond dog treats, the company is developing applications in aquaculture feed, livestock diets, and eventually human food products such as shakes, protein bars, and dairy alternatives.

The Wider Landscape of Fermentation-Based Proteins

It’s worth noting here that MicroHarvest is certainly not alone in pursuing microbial solutions. The sector has attracted nearly $1 billion in global investment over the past year, with Europe claiming close to half of that. Examples of other companies in this space include:

– Finland’s Solar Foods, which has developed Solein, a protein made from microbes fed with hydrogen and carbon dioxide captured from the air. Its first commercial facility is under construction and it has received approval for human consumption in Singapore.

– Germany’s Formo, which is using precision fermentation to produce casein proteins for dairy-free cheese.

– Dutch company Vivici, which has raised over €30 million in 2025 to scale animal-free whey proteins made with microbes.

– UK-based Enough cultivates fungi to create mycoprotein, used in plant-based meat substitutes.

Also, large food companies such as Nestlé and Unilever are partnering with startups to explore microbial protein for mainstream products, seeing the potential for lower-impact ingredients that can appeal to sustainability-minded consumers.

Hurdles

Despite the momentum, microbial protein faces some serious hurdles. The first is, of course, regulation. MicroHarvest has already submitted a full dossier to the European Food Safety Authority seeking approval for human use. The process involves extensive safety and DNA screenings, and while the company is optimistic, approval timelines remain uncertain. Other alternative-protein startups have seen years of delay in Europe, forcing some to launch in more permissive markets such as Singapore.

Cost is another key concern. While microbial fermentation is highly efficient, building large-scale production plants requires significant capital investment. MicroHarvest has announced plans for a 15,000-tonne facility by 2027, more than 40 times its current output, but scaling to that level will test both its technology and its financial backing.

Consumer perception is a further challenge. For example, although microbes are commonplace in familiar foods, the idea of eating “bacteria powder” may not appeal to all shoppers. Industry observers note that how the products are framed, whether as “fermented protein” or as “next-generation ingredients”, could influence public acceptance.

The competitive landscape is also intensifying. For example, dozens of startups are experimenting with different microbes, feedstocks, and fermentation technologies. At the same time, insect protein, cultured meat, and plant-based innovations are all vying for space in the growing alternative-protein market.

What Does This Mean For Your Organisation?

The balance for MicroHarvest and its peers lies in proving they can deliver at scale while keeping costs competitive and building trust with regulators and consumers. If they succeed, microbial proteins could become more than a niche ingredient, offering a reliable and efficient source of nutrition at a time when global demand is set to rise sharply. For UK businesses in particular, this could mean opportunities in supply chain partnerships, retail adoption, and product innovation across both pet and human food markets. It also raises questions for existing agricultural producers, who may need to adapt to the emergence of new protein streams that use fewer resources and appeal to environmentally conscious buyers.

For policymakers and regulators, the challenge will be how quickly they can evaluate and approve these technologies without compromising safety. Investors, meanwhile, will be watching closely to see which companies can move from pilot plants to full commercial output. MicroHarvest’s ambition to open a 15,000-tonne facility in just two years will be one such test.

The future of food will not be decided by a single technology, but microbial protein now has a seat at the table. Whether it becomes a mainstay of diets or remains limited to specialist markets will depend on cost, regulation, and public acceptance. For now, the evidence suggests it has the potential to deliver real sustainability gains, and businesses across Europe and beyond are positioning themselves to find out just how far this promise can go.